Dear Patriots & MHK,

You know the answers already, and you are still asking the same question. Yes they are still relevent. You have a right to ask the question, You may get your answer. But that answer may not be the right answer or the honest answer you are looking for. An answer may be an answer, not necessary to be truthful answer. Myanmar dosn't want to be nody's puppet. Is that a familier answer? Can you accept that answer?

I have an answer for you. Myanmars is being held hostage, Myanmar is being black mailed by th IC, US & UK . The reason is, Ma Su Kyi and all because Myanmar wants to be Free, Independent and be a Sovereign nation.

It's no use to put the blames on our laders in the past or at present, the truth is Myanmar happened to be a Free, Independent, Sovereign nation with Ko Min Ko Chin. Myanmar is Myanmar, Myanmars are Myanmars and it is not Thailand or Thais. Myanamar does not want to be anybody's sandwich meat. Myanmar will die being Myanmar, proud of being Myanmar, thy will take that pride to their graves. It is better to die then to be slaves. Some Myanmar have their rights to be slave.

Myanmars are Myanmars. As I always said, Myanmar make simple thing difficult and difficult things impossible.

IC is made of former colonial powers. After WW II some colonial powere became under the umbralla if US and UK. Some countries are free in names only. They can say, express what they like , that is limited. After the WW II and former colonies gained their independence, name only, the same as the Japanese gave Myanmar its Independence when they were in Myanmar. British tried the same after WW II.

Some Free, Independent, Sovereign nations became under US and UK up to this minute. Thanks to Hitlar, and Mosolini. They can say what they like, but they cannot do what they like, that is how I see them. They have to say yes to whatever US and UK said, they have to go along with US and UK.

For Myanmar, Free means Free, Independence means Independence, Sovereign means Sovereign, nothing else. There is no other meaning for Myanmar. Myanmar understands what those means, because Myanmar had been under Myanmar rulers, under British rulers, and under the Japanese rulers. Myanmar knows what it is.

Reconstruction of Myanmar economically. At the moment IC is very busy, reconstruction Iraq or Afghanistan, their own doing or for letting US and UK do . They destruct them by themselves, in the name of democracy, in the name of human rights. They are reaping what they sowed. They have their interests, they have their benefits one way or the other. They are all hands in gloves. No matter what kind of impression they may be giving.

For the IC to help Myanmar or one of the powerful countries to help Myanmar, is in their terms only. Myanmar must be in line with them. Simple way to look at it is, if Myanmr does not want to be exploited , manipulated or undermined by IC or one particular powerful nation, Myanmar will get nothing. Forget about being a mamber of UN, or non - aligned, or Asean or this or that.

Besides, leaders of SPDC are strong, IC does not want to see Myanmar any stronger. Especially those some countries in the IC do not want Myanmars united as one. Because when all Myanmars became united, they lost Myanmar totally. But they never uttered a wod about why they lost Myanmar how they treated Myanmars during those 125 years. They don't want to know why Myanmar wants to be non-aligned. Even today theyu are not treating right.

There is nobody they can trust in Myanmar, this is where Ma SU Kyi came in. They think they can ntrust Ma Su Kyi, becuse she is well trained in the west. not like her father Ko Aung San whom they could not trust. Ko AUng San was wasted in the end.

Ma Su Kyi can also be wasted at any time, if they decided they cnnot trust her anymore. If it happened , who do you think will get the blame? SPDC of course. Even Ma Su Kyi died of a snake bite or a dog bite in Myanmr, SPDC will get the blame, No body would enquare who let the snake or the dog into her bed room. We had it when Ko Aung San and his collegues were bitten by the dog called Maung Saw who thought he will be made Prime Minister by the British when Ko Aung San is gone. What made him think that, nobody knows.

British will not take back Ma Su Kyi to England during the reign of QE II. Because there is no vacncy yet. QE II, is not the cruise liner, that is the rigning monarch (queen)of Gtreat Britain and Northeren Ireland.

Besides, Ma Su Kyi is useful for Brits in Myanmar, they don't have any use for Ma Su Kyi in England or in US or any where. They don't even take Hillary Clinton in the US, let alone Ma Su Kyi.

IC can do without Myanmar. Why should they care for the people of Myanmar. They already said, Myanmars must solve their own problems by themselves.

But who is calling for IC to help them to gain poliotical power in Myanmar? NLD and its supporters of course. The question, what will the NLD do if they are in power? Selling Myanmar to the devils? Ma Su Kyi has already sold her soul to the devil, is that what she want for Myanmar. Does not she know there will be no help availabl for her.

" Nyaung Thee Le Sarr - Myhar Thun Le Narr Htoung " Would NLD permit the west to have military bases on Myanmar's soil, missiles sits on Myanmar's land. they tried on Myanmar, they are trying on other countries as well. Why, why, why, what is their intention? Why does Myanmar need them or why do they need to be on Myanmar's soil. To protect Myanmar or to defend Myanmar? or if need be to fight their enemy on Myanmar ground to spear their own ground and their mown people? By allowing these missiles sites and military bases on its soil, Myanmar may be creating enemies, Myanmar may be inviting troubles. Is that what NLD intends to do? Does NLD has the courge, to say "NO", id that situation arise.

Myanmar does not nedd any military base, Myanmar needs developement, investments.

Myanmar will be lucky, if NLD (Ma Su Kyi)does not delibrately invite foreign troops into Myanmar. Even they are now calling for them. I hope they know what they are doing.

To these question , I remember some body was mentioning Thailand, The west does not need Myanmar, they already have Thailand. He was not wrong, was he? But he showed that he doesn't know the meaning. Well there are lots of people who do not know.

Who will genuinly help Myanmar to rebuild , to reconstruct , to develope ? Even UN does not do it, without the approval of United States of America who is the permanent member of UN security council. who is the head of World Bank, and IMF.

It comes back to Myanmr. Myanmar must show that they are not senseless people. Myanmar was build many times rebuild and reconstructed by Myanmars on community spirits. Myanmars must show they can do it and they must show they are united. If they want respect rom otyhers.

Myanmars must know that nobody wants to help a country where too many people have too many disagreement. Nobody wants to invest in a country where there is no political, economical and social stability. Nobody wants to invest in a countrty wher people are fighting each other. Nobody is interest if they cannot exploit, more or less.

For IC, it should know a country such as Myanmar, a little means a lot. Investments may make developments, and makes Myanmar progress. It may be medications, it may be the treatment Myanmars need. Their part is to stay neutral, none align between two sides in Myanmar. If they don't want to help Myanmar directly, support United Nations development agencies to help Myanmar.

IC or countries in the IC should not help, the terrorists who are against Myanmar fighting against Myanmar in the name of whatever comes into their mouth. Whoever the government was or is in Myanmar,the terrorit ill be active with their own excuses. IC must know and accept that most Myanmar terrorists are racists organizations.

A terrorist is a terrorist, it can NOT be a freedom fighter. Unfortunatlely this word is still in dispute.

What are we going to do with Ma Su Kyi? Not to deal with her or deal with her in proper time. When that proper time will be? Let her rot?

According to plan, there will be elections in 2010. There will be a new government, people's government. There is a New Constitution already approved by the people.

After the New People's Government, the new parliament will convene. That government will govern Myanmar according to that New Constitution. There are so many laws and bills have to be enacted by that parliament.

Whatever it will be, Ma Su Kwi will be nowhere in Myanmar in future. if she behaves like the way she is .

But that does not mean she can do nothing for the nation, for the people. If she only has true intentions, if she only has true friends, they could help her to help Myanmar, she still could help Myanmar and its people in many other ways. But no funny ideas.

If a person wants to do some thing useful, something right, in the right way, that person has a right to do, there is no one who can say do or don't do.
If a person wants to help Myanmar, she/he does not need a position a special position or permittion from anyone, she/he can help, from wherever he/she may be.

Ma Su Kyi once said she and her collegues are not to grab power, so be it.

Ma Su Kyi at the moment is like a wounded tigeress, she is dangerous, harmful to anyone. She should be detained, as long as necessary, if not better put her down for the sake of the people , for the sake of the nation.

SPDC does not have to do the job, there are lots of people who have their itchy hands, they will do it for the sake of the nation , for the sake of the peopel, they nwill not do it for anybody, they are not hire hands. How long the people of Myanmar have to suffer because of her.

OR somebody should take her out to US or UK, if they will accept her for her own sake, before any harm comes to her.

Regards,

Thunderbolts.