Dear Patriots,

Somebody would like to know what Ma Su Kyi has done for Myanmar in her life

Well, the following is her Ma Su Kyi (a) Aung San Su Kyi (a) Mrs Aris) profile by U Aung Saw Oo, who worshipped her, like a Goddess.

19 June 1945, Born in Rangoon.
1949 -1957 Studied at St Francis Convent in Rangoon
1957-1960 went to India when her mother was appointed Ambassador
1960-1961 studies at Joseph and Mary Convent School in Delhi
1962-1963 attended Delhi University , studied political science and
economic at St Hugh’s College and was awarded MA with
Honours.
1968 worked as research assistants in Department of Political Science
at School of Oriental and African Studies in London.
1969 - 1971 assistant secretary of Advisory Committee on Asminstrative and
Budgetary Question, United States Secretariat , New York.
1 Jan 1972 married Michael Aris , a British Tibetologist. They had two sons
Alex and Kim .
1972 -1973 Researcher for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs , Bhutan.
1975 -1977 Catalogued Burmese books and periodicals at Bodleian Libery ,
Oxford University
1985 - 1986 Conducted research at Department of Southeast Asia , studies
Kyoto, Japan.
1987 Conducted research in Special Research Department in Simla
in association with allied publisher, Delhi.


If you study this profile, you will see without asking anybody what Ma Su Kyi has done for Myanmar and its people in her life, beforre 1988 . You don't need to as any Ponna Lay or Par Par Lay.

It is said that she wrote 4 (four ) books as well together with her husband (1) on Tibet, (2) on her father, Aung San. (3) Basis studies on Burma and Japan culture and social structure and (4) intellectual life in Burma and India under colonialism.

If that was the case, I could have written 100,000 books.

This particular book number 4 which is ” intellectual life in Burma and India under colonialism“, according to Aung Saw Oo, was first published in 1900 ( year nineteen hundred) 45 years before Ma Su Kyi was born. It is said that it was as Burma and India by the India institute of advanced study, Simla , in association with allied publisher , Delhi. So who originally wrote that book was not very clear. I may be over looking. Never mind that.

Now we have new draft constitution put to the people to approve or to disapprove. We need to look at the policy of NLD and SPDC closely on this issue.

The general Political policies of NLD led by Ma Su Kyi were to
draw up a basic constitution together with ;

1. (a) representatives of the ethnic nationalities,
(b) representatives of the democratic forces
(c) experts and lawyers.

2. to unite all parties in the alliance and all representativves of the ethnic nationalities and work together for national solidarity,

3. (a) To establish the allience with all democratic forces and then compete unitedly in elections which had to be free and fair.

(b) to form a strong government after the elections,

(c) to govern effectively and solve the future problems successfully.

This has been always the idea of or the first priority of or the dreams of all leaders of Myanmar. Who were the founding fathers such as Ko Aung San, Ko Gyi Nu, Ko Ne Win , later Ko Saw Maung or Ko Than Shwe. To make Myanmar as one nation for all people as one people in Myanmar as our lreaders have dreamed of.

We have to remember, and remember it very well, that Ko Aung San was not alone , Ko Aung San was not on his own. By calling U Nu as Ko Gyi Nu, there must be more then his age. There were mutual respects among our leaders in every aspects , I should say. Can we find any of those kind of respect today? I doubt it. Why God tok Ko Aung San away in his young age God alone will know.

Well ,who was copying who I am not sure. It seems to me that SPDC's policies and NLD's policies or the policies of the previous governments are almost the same , different words may be but with the same meaning for the same goal.

NLD’s policy totally ignored Tatmadaw. Instead she questioned Tatmadaw and its leader Gen Ne Win sincerity, and honesty. When some one from within NLD pointed out “ if anyone is going to get involved in politics in Burma, they should understand clearly about the Burma Army (Tatmadaw). If not they will not be able to either a leader or a follower”

When the National Convention was held in 1993 , NLD was taking part in it. Then suddenly under the instructions of Ma Su Kyi , who came out of the detaintion, they withdrew.

Before the elections of 1990 for many reasons NLD was not sure whether they should participate in the elections or not. In the end they decided to compete in.the elections.

Ma Su Kyi always look at Tatmadaw as Fascist Regime. This Tatmadaw was founded by none other than her own father Gen Aung San who fought against her (Ingalate husband Michael Aris's ancesters, her God father Goore Booth ancesters. Gen Aung San was the member of Anti Fascist Peoples' Freedon League, who fought against the Fascist Japanese.

Tatmadaw after General Aung Sa was took care of by U Ne WIn. He and this Tatmadaw fought against all the multi coloured insurgents including Communists and White Chinese (KMT) who were supported by the United States of America. This Tatmadaw and many Tatmadaw men gave their lives and limbs to defend thuis nation of Myanmar, to protect the people of Myanmar, while Ma Su was enjoying her life, thoroughly.

How dared she accused Tatmadaw of being Fascist. If the Tatmadaw is Fascist, Gen Aung San himself was trained by the Fascist Japanese Army. He is solely responsible because he brought the Fascist Japanese Army into Myanmar.

As Ma Su Kyi is the daughter of Gen Aung San, genetically among other things she has a drop or drops of fascist blood in her.

Whatever it was, Ma Su Kyi and NLD and her supporters should be very happy about the National Convention and this New Constitution for future Myanmar.
If they support NLD, they should support this constitution, for this is not much different from NLD policies., except Tatmadaw participation.

Allegations after allegations, accusations after accusations of all sorts against SLORC/SPDC they made. As far as National Convention is concerned, as far as the new draft constitution is concerned and as a matter of fact, what SPDC has done is what NLD intended to do may be a little bit more. .

Who done it, is the only question. Who cares who done it, as long as it is done in the case of Myanmar, in the interest of the people, in the interest of the nation., in the interest of all the ethnic nationalities including Bamars. .

As a figure of speech even if it was going to be done by NLD led by Ma Su Kyi , nobody could guarantee that there would not be any opposition Like we had in Pinlon Convention in 1947 and 1947 constitution . Ma Su Kyi could not expect that everybody in Myanmar will say yes to whatever she says or does, like little kindergarten children.

Here we have to compare Ma Su Kyi to her own father Gen Aung San.
If she is better then Gen. Aung Sanor not? What made her think she could do it what her father could not do it? Does she think all ethnic minorities including Bamars will shut their mouth fold their arms and nods their head whatever she say or whatever she does? She had to do what to do what is necessary . She has to expect oppositions.

We can point out that when Gen Aung San did it, he did not get the backing of the British, instead British tried to break Burma (Myanmar ) into two main parts if not into pieces, Burma Proper and Hilly Regions.

We all know Ma SU Kyi has the support of the British, because of her British connections. We all know what her connections are But does she not know these supports are fakes and bogus. There were many leaders all over the world supported by the west, or the east, in the end they were hanged. U Saw, Ko Aung San were some of those. How long will Ma Su Kyi last. How long will the west support her on what conditions ?

Does she not know that? No, she does not, for she is crazy for power to take revenge on Tatmadaw for her own personnel reasons, may be.

Regards,

Thunderbolts.