Dear Patriots

Ko Aung San was a Tatmadaw General, Ko Aung San was a civilian politician, himself .he was a Tatmadaw man leading Myanmar politic.

True, Bogyoke Aung San fought against British, he fought against the Japanese. But as a matter of fact together with Bogyoke Aung San, Bo Ne Win fought against the British, fought against the Japanese . But Bo Ne Win also fought, against the Communists, fought against the Kayin ( KNDO ), fought against multi coloured insurgencies . not to forget he fought against KMT white Chinese. As a matter of fact Bo Ne Win fought enemies of the nation of Myanmar foreign and domastic, which Ko Aung San never dreamt of. Is it a fair comment?
That is I am talking about one man and one man alone. What about the Tatmadaw that he led. I see no difference.

Unfortunately or facts of politic, civilian politicians including U Nu may have had created many more insurgents while trying to create or to preserve Union of Myanmar as one nation for all people as one. But Burma ( Myanmar) was never like this. Governments of Union of Burma managed to keep insurgents at bays. That was because Myanmar Tatmadaw was united and strong.

Let us look at the Tatmadaw a bit. It was formed by patriotic politicians in accord with a natural objectives of liberation of subjugation. It was chronicled that Tatmadaw was conceived of natural politic as it was formed with natural politician who became members of Tatmadaw. Ko Aung S an and some of his comrades were students turned to politicians and they formed themselves a Tatmadaw. After the independence some carried on and stayed in Tatmadaw, some gone into business, some gone into politic. But they all were soldiers from Myanma Tatmadaw.

Before Ma Su Kyi was born, while her father was still very much alive there were wicked schemes to break up the Tatmadaw ( BIA , BDA , etc.) There were those who wanted continued colonial rule in our country , lackeys of colonialists and national traitors as we have here in Myanmar today. They have a strong dislike of united strength of Tatmadaw and people. Their ill attempts that have been made from the time of fascism , colonialism.

Being jealous of the Tatmadaw striving in all aspects for the country’s transition into peaceful , modern and developed democratic one, they who oppose SPDC, relying on external elements with negative views are still attempting to break up or weaken the strength of Tatmadaw. With intent to grab the State Power with the belief that they will realise their aim only if the Tatmadaw breaks up.

If Ma Su Kyi does not want to acknowledge what Tatmadaw is doing, May be because she saw U Ne Win was better than her own father. if she doesn’t want to recognised what the Tatmadaw led by U Ne Win was doing that is her own problem. But the people also see what she is doing, the people are also taking notes of what Ma Su Kyi is doing. The people know what is black and what is white.

She had been attacking U Ne Win from left and right. I could find no reason why she did that but a pure jealousy against U Ne Win, I think. Or her deliberate attempts to mislead the people , to attract the people , to give a last push to the already falling old soldier to fade away .

Ma Su Kyi said, her attacks were nothing personnel. That may be true to a certain extant , but her words against U Ne Win showed her hatred for him. Was it her hatred or was it U Tin Oo’s hatred for U Ne Win. The whole of Burma knew, the whole of Tatmadaw knew how jealous, U Tin Oo or his wife are against U Ne Win and his wife Daw Khin MayThan. That is another story.

Ma Su Kyi was away from Burma most of the time. Hatred cannot be from her heart, it must be from U Tin Oo, her mentor who was feeding her with all the information. Ma Su Kyi was being used by U Tin Oo, thoroughly blinded by U Tin Oo and those around her.

There is nothing unjust to glorify Tatmadaw. Crisis after crisis in Myanmar in Myanmnar Tatmadaw led by Gen Ne Win had to take responsibility, and tok care of Union of Myanmar. And Ma Su Kyi tried to tell the people U Ne Win himself was the responsible or a burden himself.

It became too much, one critic who respected Ma Su Kyi deeply could not restrain himself from rebuking her;

“ The army built up by your father exited in the past. It no longer exits today. As army can never its place itself above an organization elected by the people . That is something we must fight against If we don’t , then it will be very dangerous for our country If anyone is going to get involved in politic in Burma, they should understand clearly about the Burma Army. If not they will not be able to be either a leader or a follower.”

Ma Su Kyi did not know what that meant. “ Rebuke “ is a lovely word, cleverly used. The translator did not use the word, “ scold “ which may down grade Ma Su Kyi, Whatever it was, the fact is U Chit Khaing tried to calm her down ,he did not try to put her down or down grade her.

My father , my father, Aung San, Aung San that was all she was saying. Bo Ne Win also have had many sons and daughters Ma Su Kyi must know. They have no God fathers neither. No Gore Booth nor Moreland, no Anna Elliot not John O’ Kerr.

Aung San is familiar to all people in Myanmar, to all who are connected with Myanmar. But she was saying as if there were no other national leaders who paid their lives for Myanmar’s independence together with her father Aung San who were dead or still alive , as if there were no other Myanmars, who admired and honoured Aung San but her. She had no respect for somebody else’s fathers but only for her father. As if they were there as if they were nothing.

For me , Ma Su Kyi just woke up from the wrong side of the bed. She was having nightmare or at least she was sleep walking..

Including her private secretary Ma Thein Gi, and many who went to prison because of her, suggested her that her approaches were not right. After she was released Ma Thein Gi wrote in the Asiaweek about her experience with Ma Su Kyi, how she tried to calm Ma SU Kyi down and why she had to leave Ma Su Kyi. Many other young NLD members who criticised Ma Su Kyi were expelled from the party. And Ma Su Kyi called U Ne Win and Gen Saw Maung, dictators, their method were fascism.

Ma Su Kyi said on her Irrawaddy tour, “ it is shameful for anyone to be happy when most of the people in the country are suffering. If anyone can live like that then they have no heart. Anyone who only cares about themselves and their own family and immediate surrounding is not a real human being” .

Those were her own words. If what she said were true, she should ask her self what was she also doing, where was she when the whole country was suffering?
Where was Ma Su Kyi when the Communists and Kayins (KNDO) had taken some parts of Burma (Myanmar ? I know what she will say, she was only 5 years old. She could not do anything. She left Yangon in 1960 together with her mother to India. That time she was a young girl about 15 years. And after that did she ever offered her services to the nation of Myanmar and to the people of Myanmar while other young women of Myanmars were already serving the nation and serving the people. Where was Ma Su Kyi all these time, who was she serving?

She denied she did not call for economic sanctions, but she admits that she supports the sanction.She will continue doing that until such time. In the mean time the people of Myanmar are suffering. She said they are not. Ma Su Kyi may not be suffering, because of economic sanctions, so why should she care , she never care for anyone in her life, but herself.

The question is , hasn’t she got a heart, a mother’s heart, is she not a human ? She is the only one who can answer to these questions.

Since 1948 all walks of life, every Tom, Dick and Harry in Myanmar went to Azarnigone to pay their respect to Bogyoke Aung San and other leaders to honour them. That is something like a ritual in Myanmar. Government sponsored or state function. Azarni Nay is a holiday in Myanmar.
How many times on her own she visited her father tomb, at any other time?

On the 19 July 1989, Martyre‘s Day, Ma Su Kyi said “ General Aung San was a national leader who tries to give everyone their freedom and rights. Therefore people ought to be allowed freedom honouring him. However the people have been intimidated by the SLORC, in all kinds of ways. This is clearly a direct contradiction of Aung San’s method. Out of respect and love for General Aung San we must be able to boycott the Martyrs’ Day organised by the SLORC We must stay in our own house and let the world know that we are the prisoners in our own country.”

Ma Su Kyi did not want the people to pay their respect to Ko Aung San, she did not want people to honour Ko Aung San. She told the people not to attend the Martyrs’ Day, she told them to stay indoors and she said to let the world know that they are the prisoners in their own country.

You locked yourself in and you are the who was shouting for help saying you are locked in. Oh, Ma Su Kyi, wasn’t other any other alternative?

Joan or Arc, she confronts everything and every one believing God was with her. In the end she was torched to death. Some people might argue that Ma Su Kyi case is different. Joan was against the English, Ma Su Kyi is not against English not even against British. In a sense French sacrificed Joan to the English to get what they want as Jesus was.

By the way, did Ma Su Kyi know, that Mausoleum (Azarni Beik Mhan ) was once blown up by the Koreans in an attempt to assassinate other Koreans. Since then in and out of that place was restricted. I wonder where she was at the time.

Myanmar Buddhists follow the teaching of Buddha , they don’t worship the dead or the Zombis. Ko Aung San was Ma Su Kyi’s father, the father she hardly know. I can understand her feeling

Ma Su Kyi was lucky in a way, when Myanmars were queuing for rice, cooking oil, salt, chilly and onion , she was not among the people. She was one of those upper crust, as the daughter of General Aung San. She did not need to stand in the queue. Even now she is well look after by the minders. Having a good life, that she never had in England, while other Myanmar peoples are suffering in many ways. She may know about suffering in theories but I bet she never had any experienced on suffering in her life.

About the “FASCISM” Bogyoke Aung San and thirty comrades were trained by the imperial Japanese army. Did they not know the Japanese were the fascists?

To be honest and to be sincere. We do not know very much about Bogyoke Aung San , because he was short lived. We did not know as much as we know about Ma Su Kyi who happened to be his daughter. When Bogyoke Aung San was accused of killing a man, though it was as a necessity, it must be that fascism that Japanese drove into his mind. Ma Su Kyi is the daughter of Bogyoke Aung San. All armies in the world and army men or women are fascists in one way or the other. The whole world is seeing them today. That they are not behaving like human.

Ma Su Kyi is the daughter of a fascist trained Ko Aung San ? She is the daughter of a leftist named Ko Aung San . Could she be a fascist or could she be a leftist? She could be anything. She is the only one who can answer these questions.

Ma Su Kyi welcomed anybody into her party as long as they carry a banner,
“ DEMOCRACY “, irrespective of whether the forces consist of ex communists, ex-pro-communists, ex-union party members, ex-BSPP , members or ex -army officers .What she did not mentioned were ex- convicts , ex- Buddhist monks including fakes and bogus monks, criminal, thieves, robbers and looters and rapists., absconders, and fugitives .

does Ma Su Kyi not realised what she was doing, what she was saying?

SPDC is heading for democracy , her policies and SPDC’s are nothing much difference. Yet she cannot join hands with SPDC, but she will join hands with those democratic forces irrespective of whatever they are, as long as they acknowledge and recognise her as the BIG BOSS..

In the beginning there were 104 different parties, under the umbrella of NLD, later 42 , now , nobody knows. Ma Su Kyi is the single representative of all
parties authorised to talk to SLORC/SPDC, to discuss with SLORC/SPDC, NLDdecided since then.

What will Ma Su Kyi say the US Army at Guantanamo Bay. The way they treated the so called terrorists. Those who are being detained, without any charges. What will Ma Su Kyi say about US Army in Vietnum, Laos, Cambodia, Afghanistan and Iraq. What will she call them?

Will she say those are not her business, or will she say “the whites have the rights”.

If all go well , referendum in May, elections in 2010. All people of Myanmar, must have their conscience clear. there is nothing to confused. They should know about themselves, they should know about their people, they should know about their country. They should do what their first instinct tell them to do.

Whatever Sr. Gen Than Shwe and SPDC do, is not right for some. Whatever Ma Su Kyi and NLD do is not right for the others as well . The best is lets have the referendum in May , elections in 2010 and elect those who is neither Sr.Gen Than Sahe nor Ma Su Kyi. Who we think can do better for Myanmar . Will that be enough ?

I don’t think so. We are talking about FREE and FAIR elections. What do we mean by FREE and FAIR? Do we understand what FREE and FAIR are? What is FREE and what is FAIR?.
No matter how FREE and FAIR, if the opposition does not win somebody will say it was not FREE and FAIR.

No matter how FREE and FAIR , If NUP or those who were leaning towards SPDC wins, they still will say it was not FREE and FAIR.

We are seeing in some countries before the result came out opposition is announcing the victory, claiming the victory. Their supporters including foreign media announcing the victory of their puppets.

That was what happened in 1990 in Myanmar. Long before the polls were closed foreign media BBC, VOA announcing NLD victory, not to mentioned that they were campaigning for Ma Su Kyi‘s NLD, especially BBC. They were campaigning against NUP and others. How FREE and FAIR can it be?

NLD complaint for not getting fair share of the air time in BBS or in local papers. Did they really need that after all the who world was campaigning for them on behalf of them. VOA, BBC were braining washing the people of Myanmar FREELY.

Foreign observers , what is the different , they are the supporters of the opposition. Or they don’t know what Myanmars are doing, These foreigner looking at Myanmar with their standardised eyes and minds They see everything different when they look at Myanmar. Will they be FREE and FAIR to judge Myanmar, to give their judgement or comments on Myanmar?

For example weapon inspector Hans Blix & UNSG Koffi Annan, what could they do to have FREE and FAIR in the world?

Do you consider yourself as a FREE and FAIR person? Be honest to yourself, because that will be Paya Kyite - Nat Kyite - Luu Kyite. That is all it counts.

Know yourself, know your country.

Thunderbolts.