Re:Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Favoured: 0
|
|
|
TOPIC: Re:Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan
|
|
|
|
Re:Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan 5 Months, 1 Week ago
|
Karma: 5
|
Thanks for the contribution “linsi”. Very informative link also. In my opinion to rub India or to do more to India than to Bhutan by intrusion of Chinese troops into Bhutan reveal the disrespect by the Chinese against the people of Bhutan no matter how small or insignificant that nation is. In my opinion, the UN is just a symbol and not an effective or strong Organization. I do not want to call World’s Organization for UN is powerless and ineffective in solving many world’s problems. I agree it is better to have something achieve somewhere but as the humans move to high tech and better understanding, we need an effective group of nations that stands for the dignity, integrity and rights of human kind as a whole regardless of regional and races or cultures involved. It is a known fact that China already taken Tibet by force. There are some who submit to China’s aggression for many reasons and there are those who don’t. Of course if one argue that going back centuries will only emerge problems than solutions. Look at United States or Mexico as an example. If one goes back to centuries ago US and Mexico is ruled and occupied or lived by the Indians thus the notion of Indians owning United States and Mexico stands (according to ancient historical facts). Right now China rules Tibet (by invasion) and that is a fact, BUT…………………the new generations of Tibetans are more informed, more intelligent, more educated and more smart and as you know and we all know humans tend to take over by newer younger generations one after another generation after generation changing the world as times goes by. The world today is different than the world yesterday. Constant changes are occurring in all parts of the world. Europe is now united as one. There is no more Eastern Europe or Western Europe. No more Soviet Union either. China had many provinces that they annexed including Tibet. Talking about China some provinces that they annex I don’t think there is no problems for the inner feelings of the repressed ethnics, they are not happy with the Chinese rule. These are the facts. A nation as big as Soviet Union collapse and many independent and free nations emerge (these oppressed small nations are not happy with the Russians' rule). It may take 50 or 70 or 100 years but empires do collapse. This also a fact. How Asia will cope with rising freedom democratization (according to their nature) is yet to be seen. Energy crunch is looming as developing escalates Asia.
South Asia consist of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Tibet, Bhutan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma. True, each has its own problems and the problems between India and Pakistan especially the Kashmir dispute (India vs. Pakistan) is not a solved problem and each nation own nuclear weapons and now Bhutan? (India vs. China) both have nuclear weapons.
Indian Ocean is vital for it is the gateway to Gulf States which have the world’s largest Oil reserves.
Thanks for stepping out and contribute/sharing your insights/thoughts Linsi.
Regards.
linsi wrote:
QUOTE:
Paradoxan wrote:
QUOTE:
In fact India is surrounded by hostile nations (is it the strategy of China?) namely Sri lanka, Bangladesh, China, Pakistan and Burma (China’s puppet) But India is trying very hard to woo/entice Burma (Burma can be regarded as part of South Asia as well as South East Asia for she is situated/located in the junction of such) away from the orbit of China by giving arms and ammunitions, military hardware, financial aid and so on. India does not want to be “boxed” by China.
Any one any thoughts on this Strategic Fields of South Asia? Please do step out and share us, exchange, discuss and argue/debate your thoughts, insights and opinions.
regards,
Paradoxan.[/color]
feudalism can be seen all throughout Asia, Asia has never risen from
a feudal state- but the likes are also seen in the middle east
as it is happening in ghaza- (present) and even all throughout
the world- (Bosnia/Serbia etc)
Sri Lanka,Bangadesh,Pakistan, Burma, with China's exemption
has been fighting internal problems of their own,
either working with terrorism from without or military rule from within
A nation could only rise above these conflicts if governments
are strong enpough and integral in upholding the rule of law,
freedom and democracy (own version)
to its own people.
|
|
|
|
 Logged
|
|
|
Truthful Contradictory Concepts.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access.
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
Miramar
|
2008/03/16 06:54
|
| |
|
|
|
Jacques
|
2008/03/16 09:33
|
| |
|
|
|
Paradoxan
|
2008/03/16 19:59
|
| |
|
|
|
Mynmyat
|
2008/03/16 21:30
|
| |
|
|
|
Jacques
|
2008/03/16 23:49
|
| |
|
|
|
Mynmyat
|
2008/03/18 16:25
|
| |
|
|
|
Miramar
|
2008/03/18 07:20
|
| |
|
|
|
Paradoxan
|
2008/03/18 17:30
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/03/18 19:45
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/03/18 20:11
|
| |
|
|
|
Paradoxan
|
2008/03/18 21:56
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/03/19 08:51
|
| |
|
|
|
Paradoxan
|
2008/03/20 06:08
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/03/20 17:42
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/03/20 17:47
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/03/20 17:55
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/03/20 17:57
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/03/19 08:59
|
| |
|
|
|
Jacques
|
2008/04/05 10:54
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/04/09 07:10
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/04/09 07:26
|
| |
|
|
|
Miramar
|
2008/03/18 20:39
|
| |
|
|
|
Paradoxan
|
2008/03/21 00:03
|
| |
|
|
|
Miramar
|
2008/03/29 12:47
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/04/03 21:23
|
| |
|
|
|
Miramar
|
2008/04/09 10:01
|
| |
|
|
|
linsi
|
2008/04/09 18:38
|
|
|
|
Asia Observer Friends - JOIN FOR FREE!
|
1.400.000 members - make friends, chat or flirt with people from every country in the world! |
|
Forums 
