Hi Jacques,

Thanks for the kind advice. True, it is great for people who do not care whether Tibet is under China or not and also there are people who does care AND sensitive not to acknowledge the annexation of Tibet and Tibetans as part of China and Chinese. I am just contributing my "argument" on the issue of Independence of Tibet and Tibetans. Of course this will arouse many Chinese who like to annex land and people and create the "Great transparent 21st Century Wall" of Chinese empire that stretches or swallows the entire Asia including South East Asia one by one or even as a group simultaneously. Did you notice something in Burma forum? People who support SPDC writes only under the heading of the supporter of SPDC authors. I am Burmese and I know about Burmese very well. Long ago in OLD AO forum it was I who started this kind of behavior by writing under MY heading only. Many start to realize that and start doing themselves by refraining to write under the ones (authors) that they don't like. To be more clear or for clarification, Burma and Burmese are very superstitious country and people. Writing under an author's heading that they don't like, makes them inferior complex and thus they won't write under the heading of the author they dispised. This is Burmese nature. Even the top Generals who ruled Burma since 1962 to date still practice this psychotic practice and they are truly deeply superstitious. They rule the nation with favorite numbers, they make or print money that can be divided by a certain number. They even move the Capital City from Rangoon/Yangon to Naypyitaw. These are not fictitious fictions, these are true facts. So what I'm saying is or my point is, there are superstitious people and there are people who are not superstitious. Writing about Tibet UNDER or INCLUDED or PART of China forum is like succumb or acknowledging Tibet as "PART" of China. For semi superstitious people like me this won't happened. I see Tibet as Tibet and so is Burma as Burma. No matter how much China had accomplished in annexing Tibet or even tries to annex Burma, to me THE TRUTH REMAINS THE SAME. TRUTH can never be erased nor altered. I stand vigorously on the side of the TRUTH and not on the side of the REALITY for all things MUST past and nothing is permanent including "reality" that we see today will be an ancient history one day and can be changed. Many examples of ancient Empires of conquering colonial hegemonic annexers like China had shown they disappear one day. It may take a decade or centuries but the reality itself changes with time/era. Maybe many will hate me or dispise me but that's OK with me. I choose my ground and I will stand on my ground.
When the US reps met with SPDC officials they do not go to Burma but instead both SPDC reps and US reps met in China? Why? They choose the middle ground where no side acknowledges nothing. Sorry, I regard Tibet/Tibetans as a sovereign independent Nation.

Regards,

ZynnYaw (Knowledgeable Knight)