hi pokkha,
as much as possible i wanted to evade topics like this

specially now that i know your very good intentions to bring out the best in our country and i believe this is noble.
i have to agree that we also have our own share of "best" and "worst" as well like any country on earth. this kind of discussions really draw me closer to speak out

i really find it hard to resist.
i agree to an implication that we must not believe all that is written, but we have indeces to prove that news are closest to possibility if not true.
i am not an economist nor analyst but i think we have to look deeply and scrutinize,our own GNP, GDP,taxation, currency strength, global market, investments local and international , compare it with other asian economic tigers (the most ideal is Japan/Singapore/Hong Kong) after world war 2.
I believe that a robust economy speaks about the efficiency of the government of a certain country.
outside of this is simply "corruption" correct me if i am wrong.
I would like to say that economic tigers in Asia were never declared as most corrupt although it does not rule out that government baskets have its own shares of rotten apples.
But if we would observe closely countries who belong to the "third world" categories are most likely declared as corrupt nations.
The Philippines as i previously stated was once a glorious country, now its status deteriorated so much
as we eat the dust of economic tigers in Asia. Why?
Did our government after world war 2 do their homework of efficient management?