Home arrow Forums
Asia Observer
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
UN group to examine case of seven detainees (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: UN group to examine case of seven detainees
#367
Sandvand (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 339
graphgraph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
UN group to examine case of seven detainees 1 Year, 6 Months ago Karma: 19  
ASIA OBSERVER HAS RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING RELEASE FROM ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION:


BURMA: UN group to examine case of seven detainees

(Hong Kong, March 1, 2007) The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
on Thursday sent a detailed report on the illegal and arbitrary
detention of seven persons in Burma to a United Nations specialist
group.

The Hong Kong-based regional organisation submitted the 22-page
document to the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on the case
of Hkun Htun Oo and six others who were convicted of treason in 2005.

"We have issued a number of appeals on the case detailing the many
legal and procedural flaws during the arrest, trial and conviction of
the original nine accused," Kim Soo A, urgent appeals coordinator of
the AHRC, said.

"They were arrested without warrants, denied access to lawyers, tried
at a special tribunal without jurisdiction under inapplicable laws on
multiple charges concerning the same alleged offences, and given
insufficient opportunities to present witnesses or cross-examine
those for the prosecution," she said.

"The working group contacted us and asked that we submit further
documentation on the seven men still in detention, which we have done
today," Kim said.

"We look forward to its intervention," she added.

Of the two other accused, one died in custody during 2005 while the
other appeared as a state witness and was released.

The seven still in prison were sentenced to between 75 and 106 years
for their supposed roles in forming an anti-government organisation,
which they claim was a body aimed at bringing peace to northeastern
Shan state, which borders China, Laos and Thailand.

The region has been plagued by years of civil conflict and remains
home to one armed group still at war with the government, alongside
numerous ceasefire groups and militias.

Three of the seven are members of the Shan National League for
Democracy, a registered political party that was chaired by Hkun Htun
Oo.

In its 2006 country report, the AHRC referred to Burma's courts and
law-enforcement agencies as a "system of injustice", and said that
its judges share responsibility with its generals for "the
demoralised state the country is in today".

The report is available on line, at: http://material.ahrchk.net/hrreport/2006/Burma2006.pdf

# # #

About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional
non-governmental organisation monitoring and lobbying human rights
issues in Asia. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.
 
Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.

#371
truthseeker (User)
Expert Boarder
Posts: 144
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:UN group to examine case of seven detainees 1 Year, 6 Months ago Karma: 5  
Dear John,
On 18 January 2007
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) launches appeals program against "unlawful conviction for treason and other offenses" of 8 Shan politicians who were arrested in 2005. The AHRC states main problems in the case that invalidate the conviction:

Treason: "As the government was not established by any constitution, the men could not be prosecuted under this section"

The court lacks authority

Non-reappearance of prosecution witnesses


Photocopies used as evidence

The Commission urges all those concerned to write to the Attorney General and Chief Justice of the supreme court to demand their release. (Statement)

If you look at the above statement by AHR, you will noticed that it is not depend on whether its LACK OF EVIDENCE OR NOT BUT WHO TO PROSECUTE/OR NOT.

CHO CHO KYAW NYEIN WAS ALSO ALSO THERE BUT I DON'T HEAR ANY ACTION TAKEN AGAINST HER.

IT CLEARLY SHOWED THAT IT WAS AGAINST THE ETHNICS GROUP NOT FOR BURMAN.

CLEARLY SHOWED IT IT DIVIDE AND RULE.
ts
 
Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.

Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop