I'm here in the Philippines. I heard over the radio this morning the interview of the former justice who initiated this investigation. He said that the MELO Commission report did not present substantial evidence against military Major General Jovito Palparan. They merely based their findings on his interviews with the media. Like once he said, "I did not order my soldiers to kill. But they might have been inspired by my actions." At the same time, the UN team arrived at its conclusion that it was the military that was behind the political killings only based on the Melo Commission Report.
How can a report such as this become so crystal clear credible if it lacks ample investigation? The Melo Commision didn't even present complaints from the victims of the killings. How can they possibly substantiate their claim against the military if there are no victims to testify?
For purposes of transparency, investigations involving anomalies in the military or the government at large must be done by an independent body and not commissioned by those people under scrutiny themselves.
