Home arrow Forums
Asia Observer
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Emergency decree legalises torture chambers (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Emergency decree legalises torture chambers
#238
Sandvand (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 347
graphgraph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Emergency decree legalises torture chambers 1 Year, 8 Months ago Karma: 19  
ASIA OBSERVER HAS RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT FROM ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL:


THAILAND: Emergency decree legalises torture chambers

A group of soldiers took Muhamud Arming Usoh from near his home on 30
October 2006, as he returned from work at a rubber plantation. They
didn't produce any arrest warrant or evidence, or tell him where they
were taking him or why. The emergency regulations in force over the
southern provinces didn't require this of them. At an unidentified
army camp, they allegedly kicked and hit him in the face and over the
head with a steel bar; burnt cigarettes onto his neck, chest, ear and
genitals; and, smashed beer bottles across his knees. Where the
physical torture ended the psychological abuse continued: Arming, a
Muslim, was allegedly chained to a dog for the night, before being
taken to a bigger camp the next day. After the week was up, he was
handed to the police and charged with murder and firearms offences.

While nobody knows the number of torture victims in the south of
Thailand--most are too afraid to speak out--the Emergency Decree
explicitly encourages military personnel to make and use torture
chambers. This is by virtue of its section 12, that

"Competent officials shall be empowered to arrest and detain suspects
for a period not exceeding seven days. Suspects shall be detained in a
designated place which is not a police station, detention centre,
penal institution or prison and shall not be treated as a convict."

The rationale for this section is that the person in question is
being called to assist the army or police with their inquiries, and
is not (yet) a suspect or an accused, so he should not be kept in
jail or police custody. In practice, what it means is that soldiers
and police are to set up ad hoc detention centres outside of
conventional facilities and regulations. These are places that by
their very nature are run beyond the ordinary functioning of law,
where anything can be done without the scrutiny of other government
agencies and officials, lawyers, human rights defenders and others.
In short, they are torture chambers.

The security forces in Thailand are well-known for their use of such
places, sometimes euphemistically referred to as "safe houses". The
Asian Human Rights Commission has received information and issued
appeals on behalf of persons who claim to have been held and tortured
by the police in private houses established for that purpose,
sometimes to extract information, sometimes to get money, sometimes
both. The UN Human Rights Committee in its 2005 report to the
government of Thailand expressed concern about "widespread use of
torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of detainees by law
enforcement officials, including in the so-called 'safe houses'". It
called upon the government to "guarantee in practice unimpeded access
to legal counsel and doctors immediately after arrest and during
detention", access to family members and "prompt and effective
remedies to allow detainees to challenge the legality of their
detention", including by being brought before a judge.

The emergency decree which has been in force since almost the same
time as the UN committee gave its findings is an extraordinary step
in the opposite direction because it has legalised what before was
simply customary, and has removed even the limited safeguards that
exist in police lockups and jails in Thailand. Those safeguards exist
for the purpose of protecting detainees from abuse; in their absence,
there can be nothing other than abuse. By ordering that conventional
facilities not be used, and by mandating the use of other locations,
the emergency decree is guaranteeing the use of torture,
extrajudicial killing and forced disappearance, and allowing the
perpetrators to hide behind multiple walls of anonymity and impunity.


If anybody in Thailand wants a lesson on the consequences of running
informal detention facilities, they need look no further than Sri
Lanka. In the 1970s and 80s exactly the same methods were used there,
also ostensibly to combat insurgency. The consequences were mass
torture, killings and forced disappearances: at least 30,000 persons
went through army camps and never came back. Arrest, detention at
"designated places"--which also were not police stations or
prisons--and torture were intrinsically linked, as they are in
Thailand today. The 2001 final report of the official Commission of
Inquiry into Involuntary Removal and Disappearance of Certain Persons
(All Island) stated that out of "some 654 complaints by persons who
had been involuntarily removed or unlawfully arrested and detained"
that it had received "most of them complained of assault and torture
while under detention" resulting in lasting psychological damage. As
in Thailand today, what most enabled the abductions, torture and
killings there was the dismantling of safeguards and the confusing of
responsibility for detention among the police, military and other
agencies.

The continued application of the Emergency Decree over the southern
provinces of Thailand makes nonsense of the government's pretensions
to favour the rule of law. It is the rule of law inverted, the
defiance of all principles upon which rational states are organised.
It is a gross breach of international law that has rightly been
described by the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial killings as
making it possible "for soldiers and police officers to get away with
murder"; to which we can add, get away with arbitrary detention; get
away with torture; and get away with forced disappearance. It will do
nothing for the people of Thailand other than lead them further down
the bloody road that the people of Sri Lanka have been led since two
decades ago; a road from which there is no easy return. The
government must lift the Emergency Decree over the southern provinces
now, before it is too late, and end the legalisation of torture
chambers in Thailand.

# # #

About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional
non-governmental organisation monitoring and lobbying human rights
issues in Asia. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.
 
Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.

Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop