|
“ Recently NLD issued a statement addressing essentially to the cease-fire groups saying that these groups were be welcome for any kind of talk with NLD.
If that is true, that could be seen as another kind of wedge . If Ma Su Kyi is to co operate with SPDC would it be necessary to issue separate statement like that. Who is the government in Myanmar?
Dear MHK,
When you address to me I must reply to you with respect. I am glad that you have seen the points I am making. Your understanding of Myanmar and about Ma Su Kyi, I can find nothing to argue or disagree, generally speaking.
Please don’t be touchy, don’t be defensive. Activist is not a bad word. Some people make it look bad. Activist is an active person. There are activist animal activist for example. They don’t become animal because they are active in animal affairs.
You don’t need to explain about yourself so long, it does not matter. What matters is that you are interested in the welfare of Myanmar and its people
Before 1988 Ma Su Kyi never showed that she was interested in the affairs of Myanmar and it’s people. You have your interest in Myanmar as an outsider , not because you want a chair or hoping a chair in one of the Hluttaws in Myanmar.
Ma Su Kyi is a Byama Goung, head of a Brahmin You cannot put it on the ground it will catch fire, you cannot put it in the ocean either, the ocean will run dry. She is,
“ Mashi Makoung Shi Makoung - Taut Te Goung Bound Paung “ She is a burden. She is a viper in the pouch, what more can I say. As a matter of fact. Myanmar can do without her nicely. Myanmar was alright, it needs changes , adjustments, tuning , refill. We can do without Ma Su Kyi. nobody is indispensable.
In 1988 people demanded changes , BSPP was ready and preparing to supply the changes. Ma Su Kyi came in from nowhere and took the credit. That was what I meant by Glory, she took the Glory, in case some people like to know. She had nothing to offer by the name of her father Aung San. Soryy that’s no for me. My father is not me I am not my father, I am not my mother’s husband.
SPDC is not introducing individualism in Myanmar . SPDC is a working team with team spirit. There will be substitutes if needs be, a team is a team.
My question was “ What has she done for Myanmar and its people in her life? “ That’s a simple question. Many people did not like that question, because they have no answer. They don’t know the answer. They don’t know what to say as simple as that..
Asking this question is not a campaign against Ma Su Kyi, definitely not a smear campaign against her. I am just trying to open the eyes and ears of those who blindly supported her . If I’d said I am trying tot educating them it will be like insulting, it will be too much for them.
If she was campaigning against Revolutionary Council government of Union of Burma from England. I can understand her. If she was campaigning against BSPP government I can understand. If she was lobbying for the changes in Myanmar since 1962 for democracy and human rights, I might fully support her or I might even join her.
Let’s say Myanmars were in hell , because of Gen Ne Win and RC or U Ne Win and BSPP, Let’s say she wants to relief Myanmars from their difficulties, she wants to do something to help the Myanmar’s economy , if she had campaign and called for how to make economic reforms in Myanmar , I might add a thing or two to help her in that cause.
But is not like that. Ma Su Kyi came out not like a princes but like an ogress with the “ Baluu Saing “ , the tune for the Ogress. She droved the wedge between Tatmadaw and U Ne Win to split, She called for economy sanction. She called for no foreign investments in Myanmar no tourist to Myanmar. She is against all means and ways for Myanmar to earn the revenues which is essential for the people, for building the nation. Not to forget her men and women joined and make friends with the nations‘ enemies. Illegal armed organizations , and her men and women want to call foreign troops to get rid of SPDC.
The saying is “ Lu A-kyoung Poung Mha Thi “ , it is twenty years now, you know her you don‘t have to live with her . You know about her more than before. People from SPDC and Ma Su Kyi are no friends to each other, they don’t know each other. To work together is a bit dodgy in my view.
They have no love for each other . No that is not the right word., They have no mitta to each other, is that better or what about chemicals, are their chemicals working? I don’t know.
I have spoken to Ma Su Kyi not less than three times I think I know what is in her mind or what is not. Shye showed no sign of any interest in Myabnmar, polical sense or economy sense. May be she was a great pretender. I did not notice anything in her. I am not hopeful of her to be the leader of Union of Myanmar. Her meeting with Dr Maung Maung , he attitude toward him her behaviour to word the elderly men who were fit to be her father. Those gave me only negative views on her.
Look at those around her ex military personals as well as civilian cannot give her any good advice. Besides she is not the one who will take their suggestions easily she is the one who will tell them what to do. Dictating them if you want to use that word. They are making her another “ dictator”.
SPDC has cut her off from many contacts. Four cuts are not all yet. I think SPDC and the sons and daughters of Ko Aung San still love her as their own sister. There are so many women opposing SPDC, they all ended up in jails and prisons. In that sense SPDC is corrupt why should they put her in jail in prison like any other women? U Ne Win put President U Mahn Win Maung, PM U Nu and all in jails and prisons.
Especially foreign advisors to her including military attaches from various foreign Embassies in Myanmar. Especially, the British who are obligated to look after and take care of their citizens while they are abroad. Whether Ma Su Kyi is a British citizen or not is not the case , her husband is the English ( British citizen) her children are British citizens that is what is matter. She can be British citizen at any time as she want., if she is not now.
Besides, is she holding “ Myanmar citizenship card or not ”? Has she registered as Myanmar Citizen? Was she in any of the “ Ain Doung Zu Sayinn “ family registration. Or did she ever had “ Kon Htote Sar Oat “ in her name or was her name in her mother’s book? I doubt it. By law of the land , what is she, who is she? When was the last time she cast her vote in Myanmar ? If so how was she eligible to vote? Did she voted BSPP in, in 1974?
Many questions require many and more answers.
In the new constitution that I gathered , there are compromises with ethnic minorities groups. This constitution will be better then the constitutions before but cannot call the best yet. No constitution is perfect, they may need amendments from time to time. The constitution of United States of America has so many amendments.
“ We need to admit that Myanmar military had done many mistakes to our country and to our people.”
It depends from which angle you are looking at it MHK. Frommtheir angle may be different from you. I cannot say everything they have done are all rights or no mistakes at all. If they have done it, there must be a good reason and explanation. If you are afraid of making mistake, you should not move from your place. Because moving from your place can be a mistake. Myanmars used to say “ Ma lote - Ma Shote - Ma Pyote “ If you don’t do anything you won’t make any mistakes. Your duties and your responsibilities for the nation do not end there MHK. You have to do what needs to be done. It is not Clinton Vs Monica Lewinski, to admit or not to admit.
During dispersing of the crowd and riots. If you study the law, you will find when is a legitimate gathering become illegitimate gathering. When is a lawful assembly becomes unlawful assembly and so on. When ca n they shoot when can they shoot to kill and so on. This is politic MHK, we are not talking about hunting in the forest. The protecting of animal says when you can shoot the animal to kill. I said it many times, ignorant of the law is not an excuse. If the crowd protest and demonstrated, the organisers know exactly know what the laws said. If they have intention to break the law, don’t blame the holders of laws. I hope you understand that.
Don’t get me wrong MHK, I am not in favouring of any killings, lawful or unlawful . Even in a war the rules of engagements are complicated for ordinary people like me.
Have you ever heard of “ National Security ” Well if national security is essential for US. For a nation like Myanmar is more essential .
Do you think George W Bush will ever admit that had made mistakes? No he said he acted on his information. Tony Blair said if he had made mistakes it was not his intension to do so he only had best interest for his country. That was how I understand him say when he left the office.
Once I said, if Tatmadaw is taken away democracy and human rights from the people then it is Tatmadaw to give it back to the people. What about others who had no respect to democracy, what do you want them to do? The way I see is they have done many harm to Myanmar and its people. Will they admit they were wrong and give up armed insurgencies.
What I wrote to UKM had more on these matters. I am sure you will read them.
“ how we Myanmar people can pull out of from this political impasse while preserving our independence, our identity” you asked.
How thoughtful of you. MHK, Unity, confidence, and trust, will do nicely of course., We have done it before on that strength, nothing new. Myanmar must trust Myanmars nobody else.
The saying is “ Ta Thet Lon Mway Pyi - Ta Nay De Yite Sar ” we should not do that. We must not do that. We have came along way together with the Tatmadaw ‘ Just because Ma Su Kyi and her followers say it Tatmdaw and people should be departed.
I still you can still trust Tatmadaw , Look at carefully what they are doing. Is it for them or for the nation? Think, think and think man .
Trust in yourself, you are free to associate with anybody. Take the root of fear out of your system.
For Ma Su Kyi to admit her political error? You must be joking MHK. No politician admits that he or she was wrong. Even they know they were wrong. Remember President Clinton Vs Monica Lewinski . He knew he was wrong but Clinton never admitted he was wrong he even lied on the television. If he did that was the end of him, he would be “ impeached ”. Remember Richard Nixon, he waved farewell from the steps of his helicopter on his way out. He admitted after denying no white wash in the white house” it became a famous phrase.
In Ma Su Kyi’s case nobody will impeached her but she had to commit suicide. She would also be pissing on her father’s grave. As a matter of fact, the people have not enough time to think. Their brains were boiling
Ma Su Kyi is not a bad person as Ma Su Kyi or may be her knowledge of Myanma politic. You .and I and many others take interest in Myanmar politic not to take a public. We are more freer than the politicians. That is the beauty of free lance.
What I think happened was, she has never in her life had experience, expected so much, she did not dream of it. But when she came on Myanma political scene, in the midst of friendly advices, she was forced to join the movements . The support she enjoyed were so much , they lift her up so high, her feet never touch the ground again. She doesn’t even realised that she is in the political net , she could not free herself. Sh made choices, wrong decisions, wrong moves, her attitude , her behaviours were all wrong.
Myanmar needed changes, Myanmars wanted changes, they thought she was the hope, she was the saviour, she was the messiah. It is 20 years now, Ma Su Kyi could do nothing.
One reserved question should be , if Ma Su Kyi is not there in Myanmar, would SPDC have achieved so much as now in so short a time? If we double these achievements up, we can see where Myanmar would be. The question of “ where was Ma Su Kyi “ was a relevant question. Is it or not?
If she was a good girl and co operated from the very beginning with the government, not being stubborn, not being aggressive, not being selfish, All Myanmar will be very happy. She will be of really great help to the nation.
If some body would like to say, then why don’t you free Ma Su Kyi to see what she can or she cannot do for Myanmar . Then I would ask, why not lift the economic sanctions and trade embargoes. Why not free the generals from being detained not to go to Europe or to America. To trade with all other countries normally, to see what SPDC can do or cannot do to promote democracy and human rights in Myanmar.
Myanmar Sey ( Medicine ) to heal and cure all kinds of diseases is practically not acceptable. One kind of medicine can heal or cure 32 different diseases, have you heard about it? That is where Myanmars are wrong. I am a Myanmar I don’t believe in that.
The situation of Myanmar, the circumstances of Myanmar are different we have to have different medicines. To heal or to cure different diseases. one medicine is never enough, no matter what you believe or not believe.
There are countries similar to Myanmar situation. Sri Lanka with Tamil Tiger, Thailand with Muslims in the South , Indonesia with separatists. They are democratic countries with full human rights compare to Myanmar, they are not trouble free MHK.
If anybody wants to say that SPDC is violating the human rights, then what about economic sanctions and trade embargoes, are they not violation the rights of ordinary people of Myanmar?
Why they don’t impose economic sanction on PR China Why not on other communist countries but Cuba?
Is Myanmar only country? Is SPDC only the government which is violating human rights.?
How many hands and heads SPDC is chopping off?
How many people Myanmar is executing ?
How many prisoner Myanmar is torturing, water boarding ?
How many detainees are there without charge?
How many detainees are moving from one country to another for interrogations by SPDC?
How many civilian are accused as terrorists and were killed ?
How many villages were set on fire because they support terrorists.?
How many more human rights violation are there by those who are accusing Myanmar of violating?
Who are the human and what are their rights in Myanmar?
Is Ma Su Kyi and NLD or those who are opposing SPDC are the only human beings in Myanmar, are others animals? Even the animals have their rights.
If there is reconciliation and peace in Myanmar there will no one who will be happier than me.
I don’t want recite 38 Mingala Sutta by heart without knowing the meaning of it.
Peace will come to Myanmar when Myanmars are left along to solve their own problems in their own way.
Thunderbolts.
|
Forums 
