Re:Why now only want to talk! 2007/11/12 10:34 Karma: 4

My dear Patriots,

This is already published on the second page of "Why now only want to talk!". In case you might not find this I am publishing it here on the new page again.

Thanks.

The question was, " Why now only want to talk!".

The answer is very simple.

" Myanmar leaders are no cowards. Cowards can never be leaders. The leaders are born and die. A day to be born and a day to die. A day to make war, a day to make peace."

The leaders are making the simple thing simple.

If somebody thinks the talking as weakness, or cowardess, it would be very wrong. Especially Myanma Tatmadaw and its leaders or Myanmar leaders are no cowards at all. Myanmar leaders are no cowards. Cowards can never be leaders.

That's why they are trying to talk, trying to make peace.

Now let me go on a bit.

In the year 1752, Myanmar Naing Gan under the rule of weak King Mahadhama Yazar Dipadi ( Maung Mhu ) fell into the hands of Mon-Talaings. The King was taken from Inwa(Ava) to Hanthawaddy. He was later known as Hanthawaddy Yaut Min. Myanmar Naing Gan was broken into pieces again

Mon-Talaings King Upa-yarzar sent his emissaries of 30 to U Aung Zeya in Motsobo( Shwe bo ) to swear allegiance to him(Upayarzar). At the same time on the same day Kwe Gonna Aing who declared himself King in Madayar Oatpho just before Inwa fell to Mon-Talaings also sent a delegation of 20 to U Aung Zeya and to swear allegiance to him.(Kwe Gonna Aing)

U Aung Zeya rejected his parents and relatives advices, he diplomatically refused to swear to both Upayarzar and Kwe Gonna Aing. Instead he united 46 villages around Motsobo and prepared to defend by building Htan -lon Fort.

Since then U Aung Zeya later known as Aloung Min Tayar not only successfully defended Montsobo but also took all Myanmar and established Kongboung Dynesty only to be fell into the hands of the British, because of disunity among Myanmars and because of the anglophile Myanmar traitors.

If only U Aung Zeya was weak , if only he had swore allegiance to Mon-Talaings' Upa-yarzar or to Kwe Gonna Aing, if only Myanma Tatmadaw under his leadership was weak, there would be no Konboung Dynesty, there would be no Myanmar Naing Gan Daw.

The same goes to Ko Aung San and the leaders after him in Myanmar. If they were/are allegiance to any foreign power there would be no land to call Myanmar Naing Gan. Ko Aung San and Myanma Tatmadaw or the leaders after him have nobody else but allegiance to the Myanmar people and to the land of Myanmar.

Myanmar is an independent, soverign , none align, neutral nation.

If Myanmaa Tatmadaw has not done its job, which ids to defend and protect Myanmar and its people. Myanmars as people or the land called Myanmar will not be here today.

Having said that, there never was discrimination against any race by all rulers in Myanmar. They may have argued, they may have fought, but they are one people. in one country.

Please remember that.

Thunderbolts.

Post edited by: thunderbolts, at: 2007/11/12 10:49
Please note, although no boardcode and smiley buttons are shown, they are still useable

sirMGthwar, just an added on if you like, cowardice might not alway be an indicator in leadership and more so for successful leadership and outcome of leadership.
back to the story of U AungZeya, there was a very very capable guy called KhinOoSar NgaKhinNyo. but he was said to be very efficient leader, powerful and master of martial arts but he failed miserably and his life was a waste, could have been better utilised for building the nation. also one has to remember that UAungzeya was surrounded by talented capable generals, how did he organise some of these very capable talented guys, history revealed in parts. you may also remember very memorable general MinKaungNawyahtar,how his life was wasted by untruthful individual or rather "system". time, space and people that make history. in politics as you know, things arent alway what they seem. external factors become a part of calculation and strategy nowadays and every sensible ones except some demo loudmouth and handful of power hungry bunch donot seem to consider that these factors have their own interests rather than that of ours. anyway, history has full of lessons sensible ones can draw a parallel conclusion so to speak. I do hope this time, they are sensible and productive.