Oh really Sandvand really?
(1) where in my reply to Khinthisar has vulgar n rude n abusive?
(2) why not u show all what I posted n the other writer posted n tell us why these two replies were removed?
(3) Not that I care about what u do as moderator, if I dont c fit then I wont write simple
(4) what puzzle me was where ur site has ads such as how 2 get asian girl, story of the girl etc etc, n yet u claim my reply 2 Sarsar was not good enough 4 ur high standards, very very interesting indeed.

I'd like 2 all Myanmar who love our goldenland with sensible approach, 2 avoid contributing 2 this forum unless there r clear n sensible "why messages were removed" 2 all.
(1) what r the ground rules in removing msgs?
(2) if msgs were removed by personal decision alone disregarding above rules, then let's all know clearly.

buddy O! I would understand your feeling, let's wait and see HOW?

For me, I am NOT A FOOL to follow others instructions, WHAT TO DO OR WHAT NOT TO DO.

I have survived and will be able to survive based on MY OWN INSTINCT.

For the SAKE OF MY COUNTRY, I will (CONTINUE TO) participate in this FORUM again BASED ON MY OWN JUDGMENT, NOT ON OTHERS’ JUDGMENT/INSTRUCTION/URGES.

IT IS RATHER SURPRISED TO SEE A MESSAGE POSTED IN THIS FORUM ON 02/02/07 AT 19:18 HRS URGING OTHERS NOT TO PARTICIPATED IN THIS FORUM, AND YET THE HE PARTICIPATED IN THIS FORUM AGAIN ON 03/02/07 AT 02:44.
(DO AS I SAY NOT AS WHAT I DO)

I DON’T THINK I WILL SEE YOU AGAIN IN THIS FORUM, SO, BYE BYE!!!!!!
BUT (YES) BUT HOPE TO SEE YOU PARTICIPATING IN ANOTHER NAME AS I HAVE SEEN ONE NAME HAS BEEN REGISTERED YET TO PARTICIPATE.
and hope to see RACIST RESPONSE from different names.

Some of the positive response for this forum.
I think the words speak for itself.
I writes AS I SEE IT.

JOHN,

You have done a very good job. You should have done it a long time ago when we were still in the old asiaobserver.

But still never too late.

Common sense is the essense of everything. if common sense is not available, drastic measures or some kind of force may need to apply.

Thanks, I fully understand what your doing.

Thunderbolts.:

AS I SEE IT
lol:

Most of us who has participated in this forum are participating at his own free wills and know what to do and what not to do and love our country.
At least we can express our thoughts if we think that it is one sided.In this forum
Truthseeker

Dear Patriots,

I admit that I have no idea nor I knew what was the dispute between Mr. O and Khin Thit Sar or Mr O and John. Why John did what he did regarding Mr. O's message to Khin Thit Sar.

When I sent my message to John, which "asIseeIt" republished, I was expressing my general view. In the past we all had bad experiences. Some directly using vulgar, uncivilise, rude words, etc , everything were there. Some provoked, some react accordingly. " Thar Thar Ne Nar Nar Nhet ", diplomatically. Whatever it was only the Burmese could understand the provoker tured the reacter as the culprit. Why not, after all this is a part of politic.

Censorships are everywhere , like it or not.The opposition should know that, democampers should know that. It is called rules, regulations , laws and procedures. Freedom is not free, freeedom has it lines and limits, if you want to be free, you have to abide by the rules, regulation, laws and procedures. That is everywhere.

We cannot say SPDC is doing wrong for censoring anything for laying down rules, regulations, laws and procedures or taken actions against those who breaks them.

In one of my messages , I asked John how much he understands Burmese language, not in a way because of I think very little of him or not, with disrespect to him. He is not a Burmese. I want to know his knowledge of Burmese language.

I think John is like anybody, he has his views on SPDC, they are his. And he is entitled. We have ours.

I am not making this as a complaint. because I am not a child from kindergarden. I am not asking my mother or my father to come and help me. Or I am not going dawn and bite the shin of other, this is another Burmese. I am not going down.

There are people in this forum who are using the language that only Burmese can understand. If these are understood by John as well, things will be different, things will be greater. That will serve John's purpose.

If I am not wrong John has this disadventage of not understanding Burmese Language. John may be doing his good job, first comes first serve. The one who made the first complaints is not always the right one, in my view.

John may need good interpreter. If John has to rely on interpreter, John has to trust that interpreter, he has no choice. Whatever that interpreter says John has to believe and trust
him/her. Interpretation and translation are having problems of their own, especially from one language to another.

Not many people will know that we are Burmese, we may speak English, but we are speaking Burmese in English. not English in English. We are only using English language to speak our Burmese mind.

There are so many Burmese good and bad words, phrases and sayings that we use. Sometimes I used them to reply to others when necessary.

On the streets of every nation, in every day live, people are using all sorts of languiages. We are not in the Glass Palace of Mandalay Court.

In my encounter with Khin Thit Sar, I have not spoken her for years, when was the last time I spoke to her I don't even remenber. After John had relaunched ASIAOBSERVER and when she saw the name,
" Thunderbolts " she straightly came on and she refer to me as " Nar Nar Bar Wa - WI Nar Bar Wa ". I doubt John understand what those words meant. And then in the same message she again refer to me as " Bo Lun Nee " because I called myself " Thunderbolts " I doubt John has any idea what it means.

Khin Thit Sar was not discusion anything on Burma she was just making peresonnel attacks on somebody she does not like. What the hell they, including me have done to her, I have no idea.

Again I will say, I do not know what the conflict between Mr. O and Khin Thit Sar or Mr O and John.

We are not " Cats " to run away from a house that is hot. We are no cowards. Even this ASIAOBSERVER becomes the website for the opposition, or the stepping stone for the opposition, we will fight them on the land, in the water or in the air.

The motto of this site used to be " speak your mind " opened to all.

We are not aslking Norwigian Government to kick DVB from Oslo, just because that is the opposition radio by the NCGUB. I support SPDC, because I can see their points. I know what is the reality of Burma. I have my dreams.

Today we are seeing so many people visiting this site (ASIAOBSERVER), but so little number of people taking part. Silent majority, that the Burmese way. Not all of them are Burmese, of course not.


Thunderbolts.<br><br>Post edited by: thunderbolts, at: 2007/02/05 00:38

Dear Patriots,

I admit that I have no idea nor I knew what was the dispute between Mr. O and Khin Thit Sar or Mr O and John. Why John did what he did regarding Mr. O's message to Khin Thit Sar.

When I sent my message to John, which &quot;asIseeIt&quot; republished, I was expressing my general view. In the past we all had bad experiences. Some directly using vulgar, uncivilise, rude words, etc , everything were there. Some provoked, some react accordingly. &quot; Thar Thar Ne Nar Nar Nhet &quot;, diplomatically. Whatever it was only the Burmese could understand the provoker turmes the reacter as the culprit, why not this is a part of politic.

Censorships are everywhere , like it or not.The opposition should know that, democampers should that. It is called rules, regulations , laws and procedures. Freedom is not free, freeedom has it lines and limits, if you want to be free, you have to abide by the rules, regulation, laws and procedures. That is everywhere.

We cannot say SPDC is doing wrong for censoring anything.

In one of my messages , I asked John how much he understands Burmese language, not in a way because of I think very little of him or not with disrespect to him.

I think John is like anybody, he has his views on SPDC, they are his. And he is entitled. We have ours.

I am not making this as a complaint. because I am not a child from kindergarden. I am not asking my mother or my father to come and help me. Or I am not going dawn and bite the shin of other, this is another Burmese. I am not going down.

There are people in this forum who are using the language that only Burmese can understand. If these are understood by John as well, things will be different, things will be greater. That will serve John's purpose.

If I am not wrong John has this disadventage of not understanding Burmese Language. John may be doing his good job, first comes first serve. The one who made the first complaints is not always the right one, in my view.

John may need good interpreter. If John has to rely on interpreter, John has to trust that interpreter, he has no choice. Whatever that interpreter says John has to believe and trust
him/her. Interpretation and translation are having problems of their own, especially from one language to another.

Not many people will know that we are Burmese, we may speak English, but we are speaking Burmese in English. not English in English. We are only using English language to speak our Burmese mind.

There are so many Burmese good and bad words, phrases and sayings that we use. Sometimes I used them to reply to others when necessary.

On the streets of every nation, in every day live, people are using all sorts of languiages. We are not in the Glass Palace of Mandalay Court.

In my encounter with Khin Thit Sar, I have not spoken her for years, when was the last time I spoke to her I don't even remenber. After John had relaunched ASIAOBSERVER and when she saw the name,
&quot; Thunderbolts &quot; she straightly came on and she refer to me as &quot; Nar Nar Bar Wa - WI Nar Bar Wa &quot;. I doubt John understand what those words meant. And then in the same message she again refer to me as &quot; Bo Lun Nee &quot; because I called myself &quot; Thunderbolts &quot; I doubt John has any idea what it means.

Khin Thit Sar was not discusion anything on Burma she was just making peresonnel attacks on somebody she does not like. What the hell they, including me have done to her, I have no idea.

Again I will say, I do not know what the conflict between Mr. O and Khin Thit Sar or Mr O and John.

We are not &quot; Cats &quot; to run away from a house that is hot. We are no cowards. Even this ASIAOBSERVER becomes the website for the opposition, or the stepping stone for the opposition, we will fight them on the land, in the water or in the air.

The motto of this site used to be &quot; speak your mind &quot; opened to all.

We are not aslking Norwigian Government to kick DVB from Oslo because that is the opposition radio by the NCGUB.

Today we are seeing so many people visiting this site (ASIAOBSERVER) but so little people taking part. Silent majority, that the Burmese way. Not all of them are Burmese, of course not.


Thunderbolts.