When I watch the movie called “Kama Sutra, a tale of love” it reminds me of a training school for females to perform techniques and approaches to make males enjoy the art of making love. Since ancient times in India, there are many concubines of Indian King or Prince and they have many wives or concubines of their own (ancient China too had the same scenario). The queen knowingly had to allow these female entertainers to make love with her husband and make her husband satisfied. The Queen had to share her husband with other lovers. True, the King can conquer these young beautiful ladies their bodies and their techniques of making love enjoyable and exciting but the King cannot win their (concubines) hearts all the time. This movie is about 2 young beautiful girls that grew up together and go to the school of arts of making love and elegant dancing styles in ancient India era. One is richer and the other one is poorer and the poorer had to always use the left over of the richer one (like clothes). One day the richer one becomes the queen but the poorer one entice the King by dancing and make love with him first before the wedding of her childhood girlfriend with the King, therefore the poorer one is the first one to contact with the King/Prince sexually and the richer one had the King after, thus the revenge of taking the used one is done towards the richer one. These 2 girls grew to womanhood and finally the richer one becomes the queen and the poorer one become one of the concubines of the King.

Is this nonsense (having multiple sex with multiple partners/lovers after being married) for present time/era (one man one woman after being married) or is it mankind's lost enchantment?

Is it nonsense building a monument building, mansion, castle dedicated just for love? Taj Mahal, a skillfully designed building dedicated to love during ancient times of India is still standing tall today and regarded as one of the wonders of the world. If it is nonsense, why was it regarded as one of the wonders of the world?

Is it nonsense “nudity” is regarded as some form of an “art”? Especially some artists view “nudity” as an art and there are many both at present or in the ancient past, sculptures of human’s nudity displayed at public places around the world. Cambodia’s famous “Ankar Wat” (spelling?) one of the wonders of the world is one example where one can see many sculptures of females’ bodies in nudity or even sexual images.

Is it nonsense that some people travel in search of love (or sex)? There are many travelers even in modern times of today travels in search of love (or sex). In old ancient times of India, the King or the Prince travels around his country seeking beautiful ladies to appoint as concubines and place them at the palace. These concubines are well taken care of and well trained as private or personal entertainers. Now adays many people regard sex as dirty and underground or obscene and one must be strong, bold and broadminded, open and frank to express it in public. In my opinion "sex and love" are intertwine and the fundamental insurance to continue and protect the human specie from extinction (the vanguard/protector). Of course there are times when there is no love involve and plain sex and vice versa no sex involve just plain love and affection. But, having both involved is the full extent of loving kindness that strengthen and bonds the relationship deeper, stronger between a man and a woman.

It is like a coin where sex is one side and love is on the other side but both sides made the coin.