Dear Myanmars and Thais,

I have my reservations as far as Thailand is concern. Because I always believe that Thais are KNU sympathizers and they are US puppets. I question the honesty and sincereity of Thailand. Som people have created the misunderstand between Thai and Myanmarmars. May be the historians. We have no opportunity to ske them any questions of the past. So I let it settled on " cause and effect " or if there is no sperks there is no fire.

what Thai PM Samak Sundaravej said on 25 August amazed me. What is in his mind, he will only know.butnobody else.

Thailand is a very shaky nation. Now you see now you don't situation.

You may have read the following news.

BANGKOK, Aug 25 (TNA) -- Thai Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej on
Monday suggested that the United Nations should only discuss
democracy, constitution and elections with Myanmar.

It is a very interesting subject. Thai PM is wise, he is realistic, he is practical. That is the man with common sense, who is talking sense..

Whatever Thai PM has said, we can not reject his suggestions out right. Because some of them are possible some are not possible to implement. Thailand is a neighbour of Myanmar, Thai PM knows about Myanmar better than Mr Gambari, if not better than UN. But he rather had said that UN should concentrate on Democracy multi party elections in Myanmar to be fair and free only. He was sure Myanmar(SPDC) has done bets in those fields better than expected. He is sure, if Mr Gambari looks ate those field with his eyes opened , he will see the the progress and developments in those fields as well

Why did he mention about Myanmar’s constitution he will only know. A constitution is how to govern the nation and to make the govern ( people ) happy. Thai PM may have his own views on that it is subject to his views negative views or positive views on it.

Nobody, not even United Nations has a right to question the constitution of any free , independent , sovereign nation. Nobody has a right to ask or demand from the nation how to draft a constitution. Nobody has a right not even United nations has a right top dictate a free independent sovereign how to draft a constitution.

A constitution of a nation concerns only to that nation. The circumstances , situation , position etc., etc, of that nation at that time. A constitution can be changed when necessary, to AMEND or to SUSPEND, it depends.

Mr Gambari or others concern nations were given a copy of Myanmar’s latest constitution for their information. To be helpful to their foreign policy concerning Myanmar. If they know Myanmar’s constitution. They will know whjy they cn do or they shouldn’t do regarding Myanmar and its affairs. This constitution is approved by the people of Myanmar through the referendum. It is normal there were those who opposed it, against it , who rejected it. , but it is approved in democratic way. By the majority of those who voted for approval. An also it is subject to amendments when necessary.

Yet if Mr Gambari cares to have a look at the Myanmar’s constitution and if he cares to compare with the previous constitutions of Myamar and see for himself to make his own judgement, or to make a comment. But though Mr Gambari may be UN envoy but he is not to draft the constitution or scrap the constitution. If he cares to compare the previous ones and this latest one he will see the difference , as far as national reconciliation, in the part of unity in the part of harmony. And in the part od democracy. This constitution is for Myanmar only, though , foreign relations chapter foreign nations, there is nothing for them to be concerned. This constitution may help Mr Gambari when he make recommendations, but he cnnot change anything.

To allow foreign observers at the elections in 2010, the question is among these UN observers , which observer from which country is none bias or bias against Myanmar., fair towards Myanmar or not fair towards Myanmar, who side are they on?

What is FAIR anyway? Do they care, do we have to care?

Can we find any free and fair observers in the world ? UN itself is not trusted by many, how can we trust UN observers. The observers themselves, most of them are pro west. They will look upon Myanmar from the western point of view. They themselves are poisoned by the opposition propaganda. They are diseased with the western ideas. They are suffering from Anti Political Immune Deficiency Syndrome. No medication is found yet to cure that disease.

Whatever SPDC does they cannot see it from positive way. They can’t let the world see the positive thing s what the SPDC is doing . They are afraid thye world will see the TRUTH about Myanmar. So they band anything about Myanmar to shiw on TV except negative things.

How free and fair an election will depends in the mouth of these observers. No matter how free and fair the elections may be, if the one they wanted to win does not win, that FREE and FAIR elections suddenly becomes NOT FREE and NOT FAIR. No matter how free and fair an election may be , they have the last word.

Myanmar was a democratic nation since Ma Su Kyi was a two year old child. That democracy was manipulated and undermined by some in the name of human rights.
Frankly speaking ethnic Kayins ( KNDO) other followed suit.

Today this human rights is coming in to questions, a big question, bigger and bigger . Because those who are preaching democracy and human rights are lost, they don’t know what they are saying, they do not know what they are doing. They are becoming more and more hypocrites. The meaning of “ Human “ differs.

Myanmar was there before Ma Su Kyi was born, Myanmar will be there after Ma Su Kyi is gone. Myanmar has been going on for over sixty years without Ma Su Kyi . Why is Ma Su Kyi suddenly become so important for the West, why, why, and why?
Why are 57 million people and their lively hood is not important? It shows the people of Myanmar are none existence, only Ma Su Kyi exists..

There may be many different views on this . Many different answers. But the TRUTH is the TRUTH. The answer is a very straight forward one, because she is an English man’s wife, she is pro West , she is a puppet of the British, if not the West. And that is the TRUTH.

She denied she had called for it but she said she supports the economic sanctions against Myanmar .which is because of this sanction and that sanction, more or less 57 million are suffering, not progressing, the nation is not developing.

That is Ma Su Kyi’s interest in the nation that is her interest in the people of Myanmar.

I have to agree with Thai PM, Mr. Samak’s views when he said , “ talks between the world body and Myanmar authorities could become fruitful if Mrs. Suu Kyi was left off the agenda. If this issue was left out of discussions, the UN could talk a lot with Myanmar .

Not only UN, many other nations which would like to see Myanmar turning into democratic country, honouring full human rights must accept the realities of Myanmar. What SPDC is doing in the fields .

Ma Su Kyi alone is not Myanmar, Myanmar is not for Ma Su Kyi alone. There are people more than Ma Su Kyi in Myanmar 57 million of them, the welfare of those 57 million is more important than Ma SU Kyi as one individual or a handful with her.

Since 1990 elections , there were changes in Myanmar Military Government (SPDC) including leadership in the military. With or without that elections, with or without changes in the military leadership, military government Ma Su Kyi had no place she was nowhere, from the day one.

The West wanted many things from Myanmar , from Myanmar for her. a place for her in Myanmar, the West wanted Ma Su Kyi because they are sure they can do business with her, in other word Ma Su Kyi is easy to manipulate , easy to undermine, she is easy to handle.

Her followers are trying to flesh out information by flashing out propaganda against SPDC, for many reasons including to assassinate her.

Why they want Ma Su Kyi out and why SPDC wants her in , there are different views.

We know Spdc wants to save her life, protect her, because they don‘t want to be blamed for her death.

If Ma Su Kyi agrees to be on the next plane to London. If US or UK or any other country would agree to give her political asylum . SPDC might release her an hour before the plane leaves Yangon airport .

Note, during 1917 revolution in Russia, Tsar Nicholas and family (Bolshevik)agreed Tsar of Russia and family to be released if any country will grant them political asylum. When Tsar and family seek asylum in England because Queen Victoria happened to be his aunt, Vicky did not want to know. So Tsar and his family was executed in cold blood.

Opposition want Ma Sy Kyi . Ma Su Klyi can not go anywhere, Because no country is prepared to accept her, not even England where she was married to late Michael Aris and where she used to live, where her sons were born. Would England prepared to accept her, is the question.

There are too much speculations, baseless, no proofs and no evidence.

Opposition and her supporters want Ma Su Kyi to be freed, for many reasons.

Let me speculate on her as being on hunger strike.

Some people and the opposition themselves are sending poisoned food parcels to Ma Su Kyi. SPDc is not allowed to check them So SPDC stopped all food or any other parcel going in.

If the poison parcel don’t work they want her to be freed and to come out so that they can kill her on the street and put the blame on SPDC.

Now NLD members and her followers realised that Ma Su Kyi is in their way, they are seeing her as an obstruction. Her policy of none violence is not helping them at all, they can’t go anywhere, they can do nothing. They want to see a little bit of actions

So they want to clear her off once and for all.

Regards,

Thunderbolts.